Talk:Timeline - Revision history

Cogniac at 17:50, 17 May 2010

2010-05-17T17:50:53Z

Cogniac at 17:49, 17 May 2010

2010-05-17T17:49:35Z

Ceruleus at 09:21, 17 May 2010

2010-05-17T09:21:15Z

Nimuaq at 23:46, 16 May 2010

2010-05-16T23:46:24Z

Tancred RedStar at 16:13, 16 May 2010

2010-05-16T16:13:44Z

Ceruleus at 08:08, 15 May 2010

2010-05-15T08:08:47Z

Nimuaq at 16:54, 14 May 2010

2010-05-14T16:54:19Z

Merion: Created page with 'Should we continue this? --~~~~'

2010-05-14T13:01:56Z

Created page with 'Should we continue this? --~~~~'

New page

Should we continue this? --[[User:Merion|Merion]] 13:01, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Should we continue this? --[[User:Merion|Merion]] 13:01, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
+Should we continue this?{{Line Break}}--[[User:Merion|Merion]] 13:01, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
+:I think we should. The text is from one of the newsletters of Sept. 2003, so that's why the timeline stops at that date.{{Line Break}}--[[User:Nimuaq|Nimuaq]] 16:54, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
-:I think we should. The text is from one of the newsletters of Sept. 2003, so that's why the timeline stops at that date. [[User:Nimuaq|Nimuaq]] 16:54, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
+::I agree as well. Do we want to state some sort of scope at the top of the article? Say, cross-shard official events, releases and the like? I wouldn't want to see this include shard- or guild-specific events.{{Line Break}}--[[User:Ceruleus|Ceruleus]] 08:08, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
+::Should this include client updates, publishes, expansion releases, beta announcements and other historical stuff, like devs coming/departing? Would make for a very authoritative timeline of UO history.{{Line Break}}--[[User:Tancred RedStar|Tancred RedStar]] 16:13, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
-::I agree as well. Do we want to state some sort of scope at the top of the article? Say, cross-shard official events, releases and the like? I wouldn't want to see this include shard- or guild-specific events. --[[User:Ceruleus|Ceruleus]] 08:08, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
+::I think every significant event that had an effect on the game should be here. But sure, not the EM or RP community events.{{Line Break}}--[[User:Nimuaq|Nimuaq]] 23:46, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
+::: "devs coming/departing" Great idea!{{Line Break}}--[[User:Ceruleus|Ceruleus]] 09:21, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
 ::Should this include client updates, publishes, expansion releases, beta announcements and other historical stuff, like devs coming/departing? Would make for a very authoritative timeline of UO history. --[[User:Tancred RedStar|Tancred RedStar]] 16:13, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
-−
 ::I think every significant event that had an effect on the game should be here. But sure, not the EM or RP community events.[[User:Nimuaq|Nimuaq]] 23:46, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
-−
 ::: "devs coming/departing" Great idea! --[[User:Ceruleus|Ceruleus]] 09:21, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
-−
 http://www.simile-widgets.org/timeline/ <--If we can figure out a way to do this...{{Line Break}}--[[User:Cogniac|Cogniac]] 17:49, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:49, 17 May 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:

	::: "devs coming/departing" Great idea! --[[User:Ceruleus\|Ceruleus]] 09:21, 17 May 2010 (UTC)		::: "devs coming/departing" Great idea! --[[User:Ceruleus\|Ceruleus]] 09:21, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	http://www.simile-widgets.org/timeline/ <--If we can figure out a way to do this...{{Line Break}}--[[User:Cogniac\|Cogniac]] 17:49, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:21, 17 May 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:

	::I think every significant event that had an effect on the game should be here. But sure, not the EM or RP community events.[[User:Nimuaq\|Nimuaq]] 23:46, 16 May 2010 (UTC)		::I think every significant event that had an effect on the game should be here. But sure, not the EM or RP community events.[[User:Nimuaq\|Nimuaq]] 23:46, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	::: "devs coming/departing" Great idea! --[[User:Ceruleus\|Ceruleus]] 09:21, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:46, 16 May 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:

	::Should this include client updates, publishes, expansion releases, beta announcements and other historical stuff, like devs coming/departing? Would make for a very authoritative timeline of UO history. --[[User:Tancred RedStar\|Tancred RedStar]] 16:13, 16 May 2010 (UTC)		::Should this include client updates, publishes, expansion releases, beta announcements and other historical stuff, like devs coming/departing? Would make for a very authoritative timeline of UO history. --[[User:Tancred RedStar\|Tancred RedStar]] 16:13, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	::I think every significant event that had an effect on the game should be here. But sure, not the EM or RP community events.[[User:Nimuaq\|Nimuaq]] 23:46, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:13, 16 May 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:

	::I agree as well. Do we want to state some sort of scope at the top of the article? Say, cross-shard official events, releases and the like? I wouldn't want to see this include shard- or guild-specific events. --[[User:Ceruleus\|Ceruleus]] 08:08, 15 May 2010 (UTC)		::I agree as well. Do we want to state some sort of scope at the top of the article? Say, cross-shard official events, releases and the like? I wouldn't want to see this include shard- or guild-specific events. --[[User:Ceruleus\|Ceruleus]] 08:08, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	::Should this include client updates, publishes, expansion releases, beta announcements and other historical stuff, like devs coming/departing? Would make for a very authoritative timeline of UO history. --[[User:Tancred RedStar\|Tancred RedStar]] 16:13, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:08, 15 May 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:I think we should. The text is from one of the newsletters of Sept. 2003, so that's why the timeline stops at that date. [[User:Nimuaq\|Nimuaq]] 16:54, 14 May 2010 (UTC)		:I think we should. The text is from one of the newsletters of Sept. 2003, so that's why the timeline stops at that date. [[User:Nimuaq\|Nimuaq]] 16:54, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	::I agree as well. Do we want to state some sort of scope at the top of the article? Say, cross-shard official events, releases and the like? I wouldn't want to see this include shard- or guild-specific events. --[[User:Ceruleus\|Ceruleus]] 08:08, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:54, 14 May 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Should we continue this? --[[User:Merion\|Merion]] 13:01, 14 May 2010 (UTC)		Should we continue this? --[[User:Merion\|Merion]] 13:01, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	:I think we should. The text is from one of the newsletters of Sept. 2003, so that's why the timeline stops at that date. [[User:Nimuaq\|Nimuaq]] 16:54, 14 May 2010 (UTC)