Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gems"
(New page: == Chance of brilliant amber == The article can lead to wrong info: the flat 0.6% is only about mining special resources. Brilliant amber chance is way low than 0.6% I have tested in OSI...) |
(→info: new section) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Of course, the number is too little to make a serious validation of chance to harvest lumberjacking resources, especially about brilliant amber where I was able to find only one. Anyway, it's unlikely to be the 0.6% this article indicates. Much probably is 0.1%, or less. | Of course, the number is too little to make a serious validation of chance to harvest lumberjacking resources, especially about brilliant amber where I was able to find only one. Anyway, it's unlikely to be the 0.6% this article indicates. Much probably is 0.1%, or less. | ||
--[[User:Daedalus|Daedalus]] 21:45, 29 December 2009 (UTC) | --[[User:Daedalus|Daedalus]] 21:45, 29 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == info == | ||
| + | |||
| + | http://vboards.stratics.com/showthread.php?t=211632 | ||
Revision as of 10:42, 6 June 2010
Chance of brilliant amber
The article can lead to wrong info: the flat 0.6% is only about mining special resources. Brilliant amber chance is way low than 0.6%
I have tested in OSI TC1 by chopping trees around 2000 times and these are number of resources I got:
On 2007 choppings:
- bark fragment: 191 - 0.095 (near 10%)
- luminescent fungi: 69 - 0.034 (near 3.5%)
- switch = 40 - 0.019 (near 2%)
- parasitic plant = 18 - 0.0089 (near 1%)
- brilliant amber = 1 - 0.0004
Of course, the number is too little to make a serious validation of chance to harvest lumberjacking resources, especially about brilliant amber where I was able to find only one. Anyway, it's unlikely to be the 0.6% this article indicates. Much probably is 0.1%, or less. --Daedalus 21:45, 29 December 2009 (UTC)