User talk:GregStaats
Thanks
I just wanted to thank you for contributing to UOGuide. Your contributions are very helpful. - JC the Builder 22:00, 14 March 2008 (PDT)
- Thanks. I don't mind helping out since I use this website alot. :) - GregStaats
Promotion to SysOp
If you would like I will promote you to SysOp status. This will allow you to edit protected pages such as the Main Page. Your contributions to UOGuide are very appreciated and help the UO community out a lot. Reply here if you would accept and I will make it so. - JC the Builder 12:10, 17 March 2008 (PDT)
- Sure, that'll be fine by me. Thanks! :) - GregStaats
- Done. - JC the Builder 17:52, 18 March 2008 (PDT)
New Infobox for Items
Tonight, I've been working on a new infobox for items (weapons, armor, etc). I figure that a universal template would greatly benefit the cause of this website. To this end, I wanted to gather ideas about how effective this template works to disseminating information about particular items before I continue developing.
As an example, I've gone ahead and converted the page [[[Aegis of Grace]] on my own userpage using the template, which is still in development. So, honesty, which of the following pages looks better?
Aegis of Grace or User:Thadius856/Aegis of Grace
I'd like to continue developing this template for mass deployment, but would like to first get the nod from the site's administration. If you could please leave your thoughts regarding the template on my talk page, I'd greatly appreciate it. Thadius856 21:37, 13 September 2008 (PDT)
Replicas
Concerning these, to my understanding they're just copies of existing items (or items that have existed) - Sorta like the cursed versions of the Doom Artifacts. On this basis, I'm not sure we need to title them (or their images) as "replicas"... Might be better to just mention on the page text that replica versions are available.
Though I doubt we can trace back where the originals came from in most cases...
On a related note, would it be possible to avoid using unique image files for items with ambiguous appearances? For example, Pacify uses the exact same sprite as a standard Pike. I admit it's more of a gripe then a practical request but I've been wiping out tons of dupes recently... ;)
- Bomb Bloke 01:02, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
- Take a closer look at Pacify's shaft then have a look at the Pike picture (zoom in). They are not the same. Regardless, even if you feel you want to make it the pikes picture, this is only a 1.54KB issue we're talking about. The reason for me putting (Replica) is because that's what it is. If an item is called "Hat of the Magi" I'm going to put that, not HotM or HoM when I upload it. Therefore if someone wants to upload the real one they won't run into any problems. How is that an issue? In fact, the Pacify page should most likely be named Pacify (Replica) and not just "Pacify". You don't think any rares collector will ever come here and add in the history behind the real items since there's a big buzz around them at the moment? I'm sure Manticore knows the story behind most of them. This may come off rude but I'm not trying to be - just expressing how I think about all of this. - GregStaats 04:35, 30 December 2008 (EST)