Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lumberjacking"

Revision as of 22:24, 16 January 2009

According to my math, the Damage Increase figure is incorrect. Using the formula Lumberjack Damage Bonus% = Lumberjack ÷ 5 (Add 10% if Lumberjacking >= 100), lumberjacking max dam increase (GM as there are no Lumberjacking Power Scrolls) is 22%, not 35%. Is Stratics, gasp, out of date? Or is UOGUIDE in error? --Ceruleus 03:03, 31 December 2007 (PST)

Well, all the axe pages say 10% damage increase from gm lumberjacking. Which is it?

Revision as of 04:03, 31 December 2007 (view source) Ceruleus (Talk \| contribs) (New page: According to my math, the Damage Increase figure is incorrect. Using the formula [http://uo.stratics.com/content/arms-armor/combat.php Lumberjack Damage Bonus% = Lumberjack ÷ 5 (Add 10% i...)		Revision as of 22:24, 16 January 2009 (view source) Valentiinro (Talk \| contribs) Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	According to my math, the Damage Increase figure is incorrect. Using the formula [http://uo.stratics.com/content/arms-armor/combat.php Lumberjack Damage Bonus% = Lumberjack ÷ 5 (Add 10% if Lumberjacking >= 100)], lumberjacking max dam increase (GM as there are no Lumberjacking Power Scrolls) is 22%, not 35%. Is Stratics, gasp, out of date? Or is UOGUIDE in error? --[[User:Ceruleus\|Ceruleus]] 03:03, 31 December 2007 (PST)		According to my math, the Damage Increase figure is incorrect. Using the formula [http://uo.stratics.com/content/arms-armor/combat.php Lumberjack Damage Bonus% = Lumberjack ÷ 5 (Add 10% if Lumberjacking >= 100)], lumberjacking max dam increase (GM as there are no Lumberjacking Power Scrolls) is 22%, not 35%. Is Stratics, gasp, out of date? Or is UOGUIDE in error? --[[User:Ceruleus\|Ceruleus]] 03:03, 31 December 2007 (PST)
		+
		+	Well, all the axe pages say 10% damage increase from gm lumberjacking. Which is it?