Difference between revisions of "Talk:Monsters"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Note that according to normal wiki rules, most pages should be "singular", and contain glossary information about a subject(describe what a monster is), while categories provide a "list", such as is displayed on this page. Each "monster" should be added to the [[:Category:Monsters]] once created, or stubbed, and give specific information about that particular creature. {{:User:BBR/Sig}} 04:38, 11 January 2007 (PST) | Note that according to normal wiki rules, most pages should be "singular", and contain glossary information about a subject(describe what a monster is), while categories provide a "list", such as is displayed on this page. Each "monster" should be added to the [[:Category:Monsters]] once created, or stubbed, and give specific information about that particular creature. {{:User:BBR/Sig}} 04:38, 11 January 2007 (PST) | ||
: For now, this can be used as a guide as to what pages need to be created rather then having a stub for every monster page. Right now I think the important thing is getting the content up. Fretting over spelling, grammar, page names, and the like can come later. It is important, but not so much that current pages need to be examined while neglecting the addition of new ones. Eventually I would like to have something called a "focus review", where sections are analyzed, properly wikified, and checked for accuracy. - [[User:JC the Builder|JC the Builder]] 07:13, 11 January 2007 (PST) | : For now, this can be used as a guide as to what pages need to be created rather then having a stub for every monster page. Right now I think the important thing is getting the content up. Fretting over spelling, grammar, page names, and the like can come later. It is important, but not so much that current pages need to be examined while neglecting the addition of new ones. Eventually I would like to have something called a "focus review", where sections are analyzed, properly wikified, and checked for accuracy. - [[User:JC the Builder|JC the Builder]] 07:13, 11 January 2007 (PST) | ||
| + | ==Suspecious Extinct Creatures== | ||
| + | Anyone know why Jwilson and Paladin are listed? --[[User:Ceruleus|Ceruleus]] 09:02, 1 February 2008 (PST)I assume the former is some joke or other | ||
Revision as of 10:02, 1 February 2008
Note that according to normal wiki rules, most pages should be "singular", and contain glossary information about a subject(describe what a monster is), while categories provide a "list", such as is displayed on this page. Each "monster" should be added to the Category:Monsters once created, or stubbed, and give specific information about that particular creature. - BBR talk / cont 04:38, 11 January 2007 (PST)
- For now, this can be used as a guide as to what pages need to be created rather then having a stub for every monster page. Right now I think the important thing is getting the content up. Fretting over spelling, grammar, page names, and the like can come later. It is important, but not so much that current pages need to be examined while neglecting the addition of new ones. Eventually I would like to have something called a "focus review", where sections are analyzed, properly wikified, and checked for accuracy. - JC the Builder 07:13, 11 January 2007 (PST)
Suspecious Extinct Creatures
Anyone know why Jwilson and Paladin are listed? --Ceruleus 09:02, 1 February 2008 (PST)I assume the former is some joke or other