Difference between revisions of "Talk:Timeline"
m |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::I agree as well. Do we want to state some sort of scope at the top of the article? Say, cross-shard official events, releases and the like? I wouldn't want to see this include shard- or guild-specific events. --[[User:Ceruleus|Ceruleus]] 08:08, 15 May 2010 (UTC) | ::I agree as well. Do we want to state some sort of scope at the top of the article? Say, cross-shard official events, releases and the like? I wouldn't want to see this include shard- or guild-specific events. --[[User:Ceruleus|Ceruleus]] 08:08, 15 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Should this include client updates, publishes, expansion releases, beta announcements and other historical stuff, like devs coming/departing? Would make for a very authoritative timeline of UO history. --[[User:Tancred RedStar|Tancred RedStar]] 16:13, 16 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 09:13, 16 May 2010
Should we continue this? --Merion 13:01, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
- I think we should. The text is from one of the newsletters of Sept. 2003, so that's why the timeline stops at that date. Nimuaq 16:54, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
- I agree as well. Do we want to state some sort of scope at the top of the article? Say, cross-shard official events, releases and the like? I wouldn't want to see this include shard- or guild-specific events. --Ceruleus 08:08, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
- Should this include client updates, publishes, expansion releases, beta announcements and other historical stuff, like devs coming/departing? Would make for a very authoritative timeline of UO history. --Tancred RedStar 16:13, 16 May 2010 (UTC)