Difference between revisions of "Talk:Timeline"
m |
m |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Should we continue this? --[[User:Merion|Merion]] 13:01, 14 May 2010 (UTC) | + | Should we continue this?{{Line Break}}--[[User:Merion|Merion]] 13:01, 14 May 2010 (UTC) |
| − | + | :I think we should. The text is from one of the newsletters of Sept. 2003, so that's why the timeline stops at that date.{{Line Break}}--[[User:Nimuaq|Nimuaq]] 16:54, 14 May 2010 (UTC) | |
| − | :I think we should. The text is from one of the newsletters of Sept. 2003, so that's why the timeline stops at that date. [[User:Nimuaq|Nimuaq]] 16:54, 14 May 2010 (UTC) | + | ::I agree as well. Do we want to state some sort of scope at the top of the article? Say, cross-shard official events, releases and the like? I wouldn't want to see this include shard- or guild-specific events.{{Line Break}}--[[User:Ceruleus|Ceruleus]] 08:08, 15 May 2010 (UTC) |
| − | + | ::Should this include client updates, publishes, expansion releases, beta announcements and other historical stuff, like devs coming/departing? Would make for a very authoritative timeline of UO history.{{Line Break}}--[[User:Tancred RedStar|Tancred RedStar]] 16:13, 16 May 2010 (UTC) | |
| − | ::I agree as well. Do we want to state some sort of scope at the top of the article? Say, cross-shard official events, releases and the like? I wouldn't want to see this include shard- or guild-specific events. --[[User:Ceruleus|Ceruleus]] 08:08, 15 May 2010 (UTC) | + | ::I think every significant event that had an effect on the game should be here. But sure, not the EM or RP community events.{{Line Break}}--[[User:Nimuaq|Nimuaq]] 23:46, 16 May 2010 (UTC) |
| − | + | ::: "devs coming/departing" Great idea!{{Line Break}}--[[User:Ceruleus|Ceruleus]] 09:21, 17 May 2010 (UTC) | |
| − | ::Should this include client updates, publishes, expansion releases, beta announcements and other historical stuff, like devs coming/departing? Would make for a very authoritative timeline of UO history. --[[User:Tancred RedStar|Tancred RedStar]] 16:13, 16 May 2010 (UTC) | + | http://www.simile-widgets.org/timeline/ <--If we can figure out a way to do this...{{Line Break}}--[[User:Cogniac|Cogniac]] 17:49, 17 May 2010 (UTC) |
| − | + | ||
| − | ::I think every significant event that had an effect on the game should be here. But sure, not the EM or RP community events.[[User:Nimuaq|Nimuaq]] 23:46, 16 May 2010 (UTC) | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | ::: "devs coming/departing" Great idea! --[[User:Ceruleus|Ceruleus]] 09:21, 17 May 2010 (UTC) | + | |
Latest revision as of 10:50, 17 May 2010
Should we continue this?
--Merion 13:01, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
- I think we should. The text is from one of the newsletters of Sept. 2003, so that's why the timeline stops at that date.
--Nimuaq 16:54, 14 May 2010 (UTC)- I agree as well. Do we want to state some sort of scope at the top of the article? Say, cross-shard official events, releases and the like? I wouldn't want to see this include shard- or guild-specific events.
--Ceruleus 08:08, 15 May 2010 (UTC) - Should this include client updates, publishes, expansion releases, beta announcements and other historical stuff, like devs coming/departing? Would make for a very authoritative timeline of UO history.
--Tancred RedStar 16:13, 16 May 2010 (UTC) - I think every significant event that had an effect on the game should be here. But sure, not the EM or RP community events.
--Nimuaq 23:46, 16 May 2010 (UTC)- "devs coming/departing" Great idea!
--Ceruleus 09:21, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
- "devs coming/departing" Great idea!
- I agree as well. Do we want to state some sort of scope at the top of the article? Say, cross-shard official events, releases and the like? I wouldn't want to see this include shard- or guild-specific events.
http://www.simile-widgets.org/timeline/ <--If we can figure out a way to do this...
--Cogniac 17:49, 17 May 2010 (UTC)